We have two, or you could say, unrelated bodies of work that are actually quite interesting.
Photo Resurrections, an article written by Nina Hein of NYU, portrays her sentiments towards how impactful photography could potentially be – starting us off with an example of individuals going blind by simply looking at an image – and how the medium of a portrait, could both be a reflection of past human behavior, as well as alterations of what individuals, outside of historical, perceive to be crucial. Employing such direct and dramatic events in her own personal life, this passage was particularly intriguing in the execution of how it was written, and examples the narrator applies to drive home his feelings towards portraits. Despite reading about the tragic situations that happened to her family, as well as comical ones such as driving her car into a boat, these examples happen to mirage into the background of the article, only acting as a way for the author to explain the correctness of her ideas. I read it at first glance, and thought to myself “Did I read that correctly,” and had to reread the section because of how the author abruptly mentions such situations in her life – I imagine it was the same way for other readers. Outside of the events, her passage concepts of altering portraits resonate especially well with modern culture with the advent of social media, utilizing filters to essentially beautify an image, harder to tell which parts of the portrait are real and which ones are fake. I imagine that this article was written, in light of the situation of our culture as well, commenting on the disadvantages it brings; If we asked her today how she particularly felt about selfies on social media, I doubt she would please based on the article and her vehement reaction to the man adding earrings based on a factual assumption about the past. I wonder how she feels about photoshop?
The Myth of Narcisuss…well…I did not think that was how the story went. I thought initially that Narcissus was just a generally obsessive person at the beginning that died of old age, but to think that he didn’t originate as that at first but was cursed by the nymphs that he had rejected is unfortunately very sad. It’s also even worse to think that because of the curse the nymphs played on him, the legacy of his name had been tarnished to over obsessive admiration of one’s self – in my opinion should be known as a tragedy. Granted, he did reject the nymph Echo in a terrible way and I imagine he did so in similar ways to other nymphs, but the burden of fault doesn’t lay on him. My only question is as to why this myth is not labelled and portrayed as a tragedy in Greco-Roman culture.